|
|
Sign In | Register Now Why Register? |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
IAEI News>Issue Listing>July/August 2000 >Arc-Fault Circuit Interrupters
Abstract Introduction Data provided by CPSC2 show that about 10 percent of present-day residential fires are associated with the electrical distribution system. This percentage represents 41,600 fires and 370 civilian deaths. Further, these fires cause 1,430 civilian injuries and over $682.5 M in property losses. AFCIs have been specifically designed to supplement the protection afforded by overcurrent protective devices such as circuit breakers, and to make a significant reduction in these numbers. An arc-fault circuit interrupter, as defined in the National Electrical Code3, is a device intended to provide protection from the effects of arc faults by recognizing characteristics unique to arcing and by functioning to de-energize the circuit when an arc fault is detected. In the embodiment discussed in this paper, the AFCI is integrated into the circuit breaker design, and the resulting integral circuit breaker (Listed to UL 489) and AFCI (Listed to UL 1699) combines conventional wire thermal-protection with the mitigation of arcing effects. The previous paper1 was published in 1997. Since then, a UL standard has been published 4, AFCI issues have been addressed relative to the National Electrical Code 3, there have been advances in AFCI technology, and increases in both field experience and product availability. The objective of the present paper is to discuss these recent changes. In particular, the paper is intended to increase inspector awareness of this new fire-safety product. Standards
Situation (UL 1699)
The standard also deals with cord AFCIs and portable AFCIs. There is a great deal of commonality in the test requirements for the three types of AFCIs defined above. Thus they must all recognize parallel (line to neutral) arcing faults in circuits with available short-circuit currents of 75A and above. At these current levels, the intermittent arcs, see Figure 1, associated with damaged or abused cables and wires may be insufficient to trip the circuit breaker either thermally or instantaneously. The main difference between the branch/feeder requirements and the outlet requirements is that the branch/feeder is tested for parallel faults in both the installed wire (Type NM-B) and in commonly used appliance cord (Type SPT-2). The outlet device, however, is tested solely with Type SPT-2 cord. There is also some commonality in the test requirements for responding to series arcs associated with arcing at a break in a line or neutral conductor. For branch/feeder AFCIs the tests are performed at current levels of 5A and above in Type NM-B cable. The criterion is that cotton above the break point internal to the cable must not ignite. For outlet AFCIs the tests are performed with Type SPT-2 cord, and the time for arc extinction must be less than specified arc-test clearing times. For the three types of AFCIs, the standard contains similar tests to check that the devices are immune to unwanted tripping. These tests include immunity to (a) transient inrush currents, (b) the waveforms associated with electronic devices, (c) the arcing waveforms associated with the burn out of incandescent lamps, and (d) the waveforms of "safe" arcs associated with the normal operation of electrical devices. Further, there are similar tests to check that the devices will not be masked by circuit conditions. It is noted that the Canadian Standards Association has a Technical Information Leaflet5 with requirements for AFCIs that closely parallel the UL standard for branch/feeder AFCIs. A more comprehensive CSA standard is presently under development. The Cutler-Hammer AFCI is of the branch/feeder type and consequently addresses series and parallel faults in the installed wiring; Zone 1 of Figure 2. This is the origin of about 35 percent (6,7) of residential fires associated with the electrical distribution system. In addition, the branch /feeder AFCI detects parallel faults in Zone 2, which represents the appliance cords and loads beyond the outlet, and the parallel faults in Zone 3. It also responds to all arcs to ground in Zones 1, 2 and 3. Code Situations (NEC,
Vermont and CEC)
It must be noted that, in order to protect a complete branch circuit, as required by the 1999 NEC, the device must be located in or adjacent to the load center where the branch-circuit overcurrent protective device is located. During the proposal stage for the 2002 edition of the NEC, there were many additional proposals to extend the application of branch/feeder AFCIs and to include AFCIs at the outlets. At the moment, it seems probable that branch/feeder AFCI protection will be mandated for all bedroom outlets rather than solely for bedroom receptacle outlets. Other proposals to extend branch/feeder coverage to additional dwelling unit rooms and, for example, to hotel guestrooms and limited care facilities will continue to be discussed through the comment period. From proposals submitted for the 2002 NEC, it also seems likely that branch/feeder AFCI protection will be extended to the bedroom outlets of mobile homes and manufactured homes. With respect to the state of Vermont, branch/feeder AFCIs will be mandated for all 120V circuits serving receptacle outlets in dwelling unit living areas and bedrooms. The effective date is January 1, 2001. The application of branch/feeder AFCIs to dwelling unit bedroom circuits is also under active discussion relative to the Canadian Electrical Code, Part 1. Product
Availability It should be noted, as indicated in Figure 4, that these MCBs, with AFCI function, are completely interchangeable with conventional Cutler-Hammer MCBs. Their connection in the loadcenter is identical to present-day MCBs with GFCI function, namely with a wire connection to ground, and their cost is also similar to an MCB with integrated ground-fault protection. Operation of the
Cutler-Hammer AFCI A block diagram of a two-pole Listed circuit breaker also classified for mitigating the effects of arcs appears in Figure 6. The design basically consists of two single pole AFCI designs as described in Figure 5 with a common logic trip output signal. The response to arcs to ground is set at 30 milliamps. There are individual AFCI test circuits for each of the poles. Operating
Experience Future
Applications The AFCI function can also be expected to extend to the higher voltages (e.g. 240 volt, 277 volt and 480 volt) associated with commercial and industrial electrical distribution systems. It is also noted that the aerospace industry12 is interested in AFCI technology relative to the protection of onboard electrical wiring. Conclusions References: 1. Arc-Fault Circuit Interrupters: New Technology for Increased Safety, J. C. Engel, R. J. Clarey, and T. M. Doring, IAEI News, October 1997. 2. 1996 Fire Loss Estimates, US Consumer Product Safety Commission Report, 1998 3. National Electrical Code, NFPA 70, 1999. 4. Arc-Fault Circuit Interrupters, UL 1699 Standard for Safety, First Edition, February 28, 1999 5. CSA Publication of Technical Information Letter (TIL) No. M-02, Interim Requirements for Arc-Fault Circuit Interrupters, September 30, 1999. 6. What Causes Wiring Fires in Residences?, L. Smith and D. McCoskrie, Fire Journal, pp. 19-24, January/February 1990. 7. The U.S. Home Product Report, 1992-1996, (Appliances and Equipment), K. Rohr, NFPA Fire Analysis and Research Division, February 1999 8. Preventing Home Fires: AFCIs, Consumer Product Safety Review, Volume 4, #1, Summer 1999 9. "Technology for Detecting and Monitoring Conditions that Could Cause Electrical Wiring System Fires", Report Prepared by Underwriters Laboratories (UL Project Number NC233, 94ME78760) for the Consumer Product Safety Commission (Contract Number CPSC-C-94-1112), September 1995 10. AFCIs Target Residential Electrical Fires, G. D. Gregory, NFPA Journal, pp. 69-71, March/April 2000. 11. Residential Electrical Distribution Fires, L. Smith and D. McCoskrie, US Consumer Product Safety Commission Report, December 1987. 12. Arc-Fault Circuit Interrupters, J. McCormick, M. Walz, J. Engel, P. Thiesen and E. Hetzmannseder, Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Aviation Safety, Paper 2000-1-2121, Daytona Beach, Florida, April 2000. Clive W. Kimblin is the manager, Applications & Standards for the Electrical Distribution Products Operations of Cutler-Hammer. He obtained a B.Sc (Physics) and Ph.D. (Electrical Engineering) from Liverpool University, England and an MSIE (Engineering Management) from the University of Pittsburgh. Prior to his present position, he worked at the Westinghouse Research and Development Center in Pittsburgh and at Holec/Begemann in The Netherlands. He is active within NEMA and is an IEEE Fellow. Joe Engel is the manager of Cutler-Hammer’s Electronics R & D Department. He obtained his BSEE and MSEE from the University of Cincinnati and his Ph.D. (Electrical Engineering) from the University of Pittsburgh. Prior to his present position, he managed an electronics group at the Westinghouse Research and Development Center in Pittsburgh. He has 40 years of experience in the electrical R. and D. area and holds 80 U.S. patents. Bob Clarey is the manager, Applications for the Electrical Distribution Products Operations of Cutler-Hammer. He obtained his BSEE from the State University of Iowa. Prior to his present position, he held sales positions at Square D and, subsequently, sales, marketing and development-engineering positions within Cutler-Hammer, which he joined in 1977. He is the past chairman of the NEMA Molded Case Circuit Breaker Section.
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home
| Join | Advertising | Seminars | Contact
Us | Privacy
Statement | Legal
Notices |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||